Ted Leung on the air: Open Source, Java, Python, and ...
Her thesis is that dark ages ensue "When stabilizing forces become ruined and irrelevant". She goes on to write about 5 stabilizing forces that she feels are weakening:
- Community and family She makes a distinction between families (biological units) and households (economic units), and focuses mostly in the financial difficulties of families, particularly the difficulty of affordable housing and its subsequent impact on family life. The family cannot stand as a unit by itself, and needs the influence and support of a broader community. She goes on to note that real communities are rapidly disappearing. In order to have community, people must encounter one another in person, something made increasingly difficult in automobile centric America.
- Higher education Here the argument is that higher (and other) education has moved away from education, and into the business of issueing credentials. Here in Washington, it's easy to see that emphasis in the rush to comply with the WASL tests that are the legacy of "No Child Left Behind"
- Effective practice of science and science based technology Jacobs claims (as I and others have) that science is worshiped, and then uses an interesting example from traffic engineering to show how the scientific mindset is disappearing.
- Taxes and governmental powers directly in touch with needs and possibilities Jacobs usese two terms in this chapter Subsidiarity is the principle that government works best -- most responsibly and responsively -- when it is closes to the people it serves and the needs it addresses. Fiscal accountability is the principle that institutions collecting and disbursing taxes work most responsibly when they are transparent to those providing the money. Her example is taken from the Canadian federal government's intervention in Toronto's previously successful public housing program.
- Self policing by the learned professions Think of the failure of CPA's in the Enron scandal, the recent scandals in the Catholic church and extrapolate those into the rest of the learned professions.
Coincidentally, I also recently saw a graph in Wired (7/2004) p.52 (not on the web) showing the number of engineering graduates produced by various countries in 2001:
US | 59,536 |
Russia | 82,409 |
Japan | 108,478 |
EU | 179,929 |
China | 219,563 |
Try to imagine how demoralizing that deterioration will be for a culture that almost worships science, and that proudly connects its identity and prowess with scientific and technological superiority. How will such a culture and its people deal with becoming incompetent and backward in science and science based technology?Wholesale outsourcing of technical jobs will likely have the same effect, numerical production of graduates aside.
Central planning, whether by leftists or conservatives, draws too little on local knowledge and creativity, stifles innovations, and is inefficient and costly because it is circuitous. It bypasses intimate and varied knowledge directly fed back into the system.Subsidiarity indeed. There are so many times when I've wanted a concise way of saying what subsidiarity means. Now I've found a word.

For instance, science. People complain widely of the common person's ignorance of science. And it is unfortunate that it is not better, because science literacy is a good thing. But it's probably better than it was at one time. People may still believe in UFOs, but they are wary of medical hucksterism. Right now most of the population has a pretty decent understanding of germ theory, something which was a mystery two hundred years ago. Students regularly learn advanced algebra in high school, while students 75 years ago took geometry only when they got to college.
Even relatively, I think we may be better than some statistics indicate. I saw a report about five years ago which showed the US having a higher proportion of scientific literacy compared to Europe or Japan. Something like twenty, twelve, and seven percent respectively (but obviously I am not an authoritative source). Sadly, I can never find statistics -- supporting or otherwise -- when I look for them later. But unlike the statistics people so often quote, which are based on school testing, this was a survey of adults.
Anyway, if the US doesn't maintain its position of dominance, that would not be a Dark Age. That's just melodramatic and silly.
I think trends are suspicious. Societal critique is valid, but too often it tries to justify itself with tales of doom. Humans are conscious beings, we react to our circumstances, and the feedback cycle makes prediction extremely difficult. Principled critique may more justified than empirical critique.
Posted by Ian Bicking at Thu Aug 26 09:41:30 2004
Posted by Greg Wilson at Thu Aug 26 13:23:46 2004
Posted by Trackback from Julie Leung: Seedlings & Sprouts at Mon Aug 30 08:41:43 2004

Add a comment here:
You can use some HTML tags in the comment text:
To insert a URI, just type it -- no need to write an anchor tag.
Allowable html tags are: <a href>
, <em>
, <i>
, <b>
, <blockquote>
, <br/>
, <p>
, <code>
, <pre>
, <cite>
, <sub>
and <sup>
.
You can also use some Wiki style:
URI => [uri title]
<em> => _emphasized text_
<b> => *bold text*
Ordered list => consecutive lines starting spaces and an asterisk